Of Pathein Wildrats and issue of sustainability

Of Pathein Wildrats and the issue of sustainability

Myanmar is a Buddhist country which is primarily non vegetarian in diet. Prawns, shrimps, snakes, wildrats, rabbits, fish, and poultry along with rice make up their staple diet. Wildrats from being widely available became a delicacy, then pricey and now a rarity due to excessive ‘harvest’.

The irony is that once the catch started diminishing due to its demand the prices started to climb up incentivizing more and more into the business of catching them. It faces near extinction today. I guess the story is similar for most wildlife, most natural resources. First we develop a taste or technology, then hunt it more and more, invite more and more investments into exploiting it till it runs out.

Unfortunately in the current scheme of things there is nothing to moderate the wildrat harvest at some sustainable levels. Rising prices act as an incentive to catchers who run after more and more. If their costs also rise in union, then may be we would have a balance. Unfortunately, they are mostly unemployed or under employed and all it requires if at all is to set up more traps – an increase in capital cost of traps may be , but not significant increase in their labour cost. The current system of market economics acts exactly contrary to our long term interest – matches prices alright between seller and buyer but does not match cost (in all its forms whosoever incurs it) vs prices…much like thieves who are not bothered of what it means to the owner. They are only bothered about their personal risks.

Ideally, they should harvest only the excess of wildrats over what is sustainable by the surrounding environment, greenery, frogs, insects, etc (or whatever they feed on). That level would depend upon the sustainable levels of greenery. But neither wildrats nor greenery are capable of fixing these limits themselves.

So we need regulators. Regulation is a kind of centralization – dependent so much on the regulator. Mostly they have concerned themselves with only establishing rules re fair operations, contractual enforceability, transparency, etc. Not many of them touch issues of balance between the long term and short term. And in most cases people placed with such omnipotent authority, out of good intentions or dogmatic, become pockets of dictatorships to the collective detriment. We have a civil aviator who tells Indigo not to charge extra for the 1st row. And a senseless SEBI who has told all the promoters to submit all the proposed purchase and sales for the next 18 months and strictly adhere to it. So we have a FED Chairman thru much of 80s who maintained so tight an interest rate policy to tame inflation for so long that US lost its industrial leadership. Already grappling with Japan, his tight money policy may have been largely responsible for China’s low cost driven growth. Greenspan kept warning everyone about irrational exuberance least conceding that he was the one causing it.

Our free markets are a clearing system that teaches us the pleasures of smoking without warning us of the impending cancer. I don’t know why we invest it and its advocates with so much of respect and reverence, when its system is so inadequate and incapable of establishing a proper balance between the long and short term. It is best of bad lot much like marriage and democracy. But we have been lazy and complacent and foolishly arrogant in our belief about the efficacy about free markets in not working for better alternatives.

2 thoughts on “Of Pathein Wildrats and issue of sustainability

  1. You are right to bring out the inadequacy of some regulators and that too in a very interesting way – I had no idea that rats were being hunted to extinction in Myanmar.

    But there are also examples of “good regulation” which have been effective. Perhaps Indian wildlife conservation has been a success – the way the balance between the needs of villagers, the needs of tourism and the conservation of lions that has been achieved in Gir is a good example of successful regulation. There must be quite a few examples like this. As you correctly say the balance between short term needs and long term requirements is a difficult balance to achieve.

    In the area of economics, regulation is tough to implement, simply because greed and the lure of money brings out the worst in people very often. Consequently increasing complexity in regulation results. It tends to be self defeating at times, but what is the alternative ? I would prefer an imperfectly regulated environment (which is however constantly improving) rather than complete laissez faire. Human ability to wreck havoc in the field of economics is unparalleled !


    • Hi Thanks.
      My point is more about the inadequacies of free markets and our more or less stopping further development of it to achieve the balance.
      regulation is one way. and of course there are good ones and bad ones. And we need to look beyond or ways to tweak them to make them work better. Well I don’t have any thoughts on how.

      Thanks for writing in.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s