The Art and Need for Creating Employment

Link to FE 29/5/2018:

If there is one thing that is common to every government since reforms they all had a growth consciousness but equally they all lacked an employment creation strategy. Employment it needs to be realised is like the insulin that delivers the sweet benefits of growth to the individual citizens. Otherwise growth accumulates like sugar in the blood as inequalities in society with their own adverse consequences.

The chart shows the employment in formal sector versus the economic growth over the last 40 years. Unfortunately, reforms have preferred cost cuts over ensuring adequate levels of government services and preferred efficiencies over employment in private sector. If only post reforms had created employment at half the rate as before, it would have taken care of the army of currently unemployed, a ticking time bomb. An employed and hence an engaged mind would tackle several of our social ills far better than investments in tightening surveillance or even infrastructure. Even the 1.3% uptick in the last few years may be more due to informal employment turning formal.


Unsatisfied needs – the basis of all markets and economic activity

Demand or an unsatisfied need is the basis on which any business is created. Meeting an existing demand with an established market and pricing mechanism is a safer approach to success. But, ingenious minds come up with IPL which fulfilled a latent demand (which perhaps even the customer didn’t know existed) for after day entertainment. Our telecom sector saw explosive growth by satisfying India’s motor mouth urges, never previously anticipated. But this requires foresight, some daring, financiers willing to take the bet, besides creative minds to come up with the relevant package of practices.

Demand for Government services arises out of public goods, constitutional rights like justice, safety, protection of property, ensuring equality of opportunity besides some commercial activities. It sometimes is required to serve needs where users may not be willing or able to pay commensurate prices.

Art of creating jobs – an example

Huge negative value is being imposed on the citizens by our unclean surroundings, waste and litter, sewage drains masquerading as rivers, un-cleared urban wastes spilling over to drive ways etc. There is sure a demand for neatness, cleanliness and hygiene, even if all those desirous of the service may not have the ability to pay for it.

India’s employment from rag picking and waste collection is abysmally low at 0.1% of population whereas similar activities employ 0.7% in South Africa, 0.5% in Brazil, 0.6% in Lima (Peru) as per ILO. The GDP from these activities in advanced countries vary from 2.5% to 3.8%. Employing the people required (say 50 lacs at even 0.4% of population) won’t affect other sectors since these skill sets are low and there is an excess supply in the labour market in any case.

The main missing link is who will pay for the services. At the macro level given the direct and indirect benefits it may be worthwhile re-distributing 1-2% of GDP through taxes and expending it in tackling wastes. But there are other ways. Elsewhere, nearly 30% of value of wastes generated are recovered and reused. There are people in various income classes whose desire for ‘cleaner surrounds, safe drinking water, litter free zones’ are more intense and more can be recovered from them for cross subsidizing the lower income strata. Hopefully the net unrecovered portion can be contained to 0.6-0.7% in the initial periods. People taking employment under these schemes could be made to give up all other subsidies.

The direct and indirect benefits of cleaner surroundings should also be taught to the citizens creating over a period of time greater ‘demand’ for them and higher willingness to pay for them. Or higher willingness to move into areas where such services are recovered at higher charges. The capital required for creation of each job in this sector is way lower than industrial or service sector jobs, private or public sector. The skill sets can be developed a lot easier with minimal training.

The open sewages in our cities, unclean rivers, garbage, etc.  are all a huge source of opportunity for employment creation. Of the various links in the supply chain the only missing link in this case is the poor ability or unwillingness to pay arising out of poor sensitisation of benefits and income. In the case of IPL virtually all the links were missing or invisible and it required some genius still to spot the opportunity and put all the links in place to create the ‘market’.  Similar opportunities exist where just one or two links may be missing and some creative thinking can add substantially to GDP, welfare and employment.

The disproportionate fatal accidents per vehicle is an opportunity to set right the systems by employing people (may be a lac or two) and adding positive welfare value. Our ill-disciplined roads, haphazard parking in crowded areas, rampant littering, usage of killer plastics are all potential opportunities of employment at low incremental capital investments. Our collapsed criminal policing and investigation (in deficit by at least 5 lacs); delayed judiciary can easily create new jobs for twice the existing number. Our deficient healthcare as Dr Shetty points out has a 50 lac employment potential at ‘fit for purpose’ doctors, nurses and service levels.

Government at both central and state level should identify ‘demand’ and need for its various services and ways to fulfil them rather than just run after roads, ports or infrastructure: our governance infrastructure for policing, justice, safety, protection of property, education and primary healthcare are in far greater levels of deficit.

Hiding behind our awful deficit of government services and under-development, chaos and disorder is a latent demand which could create 3 crore new jobs at comparatively low capital investment. This level of additional employment would have most certainly returned the incumbent government in 2014 despite all other troubles and could make a difference in 2019 as well.

This level of employment can be created at 1.8% of our GDP at Rs 100,000 p.a. wage levels. It requires some ingenious minds in the government to identify and fit the missing links in each case. The government should perhaps leave the return based (ICOR, IRRs and Paybacks) growth to private sector and chase newer indices like Incremental Employment per Capital Invested (IECI) for itself –a compromise of efficiency for employment.

Tribal protection or Poverty Preservation

The article with the above title has appeared in Financial Express of May 16, 2018.